{"schema_version":"resolva-reading/1.0","kind":"editorial_reading_index","evidence_for_resolva_efficacy":false,"articles":[{"id":"accessibility-baseline","title":"Personalization should not be an entrance fee.","commentary":"https://resolva.life/journal#accessibility-baseline","source_title":"Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2","authors":"W3C","year":2024,"source":"https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/REC-WCAG22-20241212/","published":"2026-10-20","kind":"source_perspective","summary":"AI products should offer a usable baseline before asking people to create a profile. A personalized experience may be useful, but it should earn its place through demonstrated benefit rather than compensate for unclear controls or inaccessible navigation.","limitations":"This is design commentary, not a study of AI performance or a conformance assessment. It does not establish that Resolva improves accessibility or outperforms alternatives."},{"id":"correction","title":"Good AI needs a way to be corrected.","commentary":"https://resolva.life/journal#correction","source_title":"Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction","authors":"Saleema Amershi et al.","year":2019,"source":"https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/guidelines-for-human-ai-interaction/"},{"id":"context","title":"The context behind an input matters.","commentary":"https://resolva.life/journal#context","source_title":"AI Risk Management and Human-AI Interaction","authors":"NIST","year":2023,"source":"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/airmf/appendices/app-c-ai-risk-management-and-human-ai-interaction/"},{"id":"reliance","title":"More explanation is not always enough.","commentary":"https://resolva.life/journal#reliance","source_title":"To Trust or to Think","authors":"Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. Gajos","year":2021,"source":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09692"}],"editorial_date":"2026-10-20","editorial_process":"AI-assisted, reviewed before publication","endorsement":false}